Amen. Come, Lord Jesus

The apostle John wrote Revelation in approximately 95 A.D., according to most scholars. Thus he wrote this message revealed to him by Jesus Christ about 65 years after having heard Jesus himself speak urgently about his powerful, glorious return. The writing of the Revelation was a full 25 years after the destruction of Herod’s temple in 70 A.D. John wrote this last book of the Bible maybe 10, 20, or 30 years after Luke, Matthew, and Mark had written faithful records of Jesus’ words and deeds. John was undoubtedly knowledgeable of the meaning of Jesus’ call to live a godly life rooted in genuine repentance in light of the coming kingdom of God. He was not ignorant of the concept of “imminence”, nor was he unaware of the context of Jesus’ declarations about his return.

If people today are at a loss for ability to “nail down” Jesus’ meaning of “this generation”, “some of those standing here who will not taste of death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom”, and other similar phrases, these things did not prove to be a stumbling block for John’s adherence to the same hope preached by Jesus. His divinely received message gives an amplified picture of God’s future judgment of the wicked and God’s blessings on the righteous: to reign with Christ for 1,000 years and then to dwell with God eternally. These “end of the age” events are predicated by Jesus’ future coming with the clouds (”and every eye will see him”), and they are culminated by the establishment of new heavens and a new earth. The picture of the earth being harvested with a sickle in Revelation 14: 14-20 corresponds to Jesus’ explanation of a parable in Matthew 13: 36-43. The detailed picture of the future as revealed to John by the Messiah, who still awaits the Father’s appointed time to return, corresponds perfectly with revelation given to Isaiah, Daniel, other prophets, Jesus, Paul, Peter, James, etc.

So then, brothers, you must be patient until the Lord comes. Take the case of the farmer. He waits for the ground’s precious crop in patience, until it has received the autumn and the spring rain. You too must be patient, and you must hold inflexibly to your purpose, for it will not be long now until the Lord comes. …The Judge is here – standing at the door. James 5: 7- 9, part of 10

“Behold I am coming quickly, and my reward is with me to render to every man according to what he has done.”

He who testifies to these things says, “Yes I am coming quickly.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus. Revelation 22: 12, 20

II Peter’s reminders are vital (chapter 3, verses 3 –9), teaching us about the attitude of mockers, one day being like 1,000 years and 1,000 years being like a day, and the Lord not being slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance. These truths are more than adequate as reasons not to confuse our ideas about “quickness” with God’s ways of communicating to us about simple things to be anticipated with joy. We certainly should never let our lack of definite certainty about a handful of verses, terms, or phrases diminish the anchor of the soul that the hope must be. (Hebrews 6: 19) Our quest to clarify areas of possible misunderstanding must involve a careful avoidance of “wrangling about words, which is useless and leads to the ruin of the hearers.” (II Timothy 2: 14) The example in this context that Paul gave was about how some asserted that the resurrection had already occurred. They had left the path of truth (in their teaching) and had undermined the faith of some. (v. 17, 18) “Rightly dividing the word of truth” is a concept from this context that emphasizes not being caught up in the chatter that corrupts hearers like gangrene. This does not mean that honest questions cannot be addressed in appropriate ways between Bible students. Nevertheless, I don’t believe that private debates about vital, core issues can be helpful when played out in a public website designed to encourage spiritual growth, not to sow seeds of doubt about the certainty of the Lord’s future coming.

By the way, a way in which Jesus’ prophetic words about some present (at his teachings) “not tasting death” …might (a possibility, not a doctrinal certainty) have a fulfillment in the reality that John and others lived to see (by revelation) further magnificent details about the certain future hope. Paul, Peter, and John had no doubts about these future realities at the end of their lives (as obvious in II Timothy, II Peter, and the Revelation.) They exhorted future readers (like us) to persevere in light of Christ’s “imminent” return. Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.

6 Responses to “Amen. Come, Lord Jesus”

  1. on 19 Jan 2007 at 8:02 pmJohnO

    Ken,

    Amen. I agree with the thrust of your post. But, two small points.

    In Mt 16.28, Mk 9.1, Lk 9.27 (”not taste of death”) the greek is emphatic to mean “will absolutely not taste death”. I do agree that the some that saw the coming Kingdom were the ones who did see the Transfiguration.

    Second, and a much more disputed point is the author of Revelation. The writer John never calls or addresses himself as an eyewitness or apostle. Scholars have come to call him John of Patmos. His vocabulary and style is far different than the other writings of “John”. The Gospel and Epistles are written from the point of view of “the Beloved Disciple” (third person reference) or “The Elder” (first person reference).

  2. on 20 Jan 2007 at 11:49 amWolfgang

    Dear Ken,

    you make refernece to James 5:7ff and his rather emphatic statement that the judge is already “standing at the door”
    “You too must be patient, and you must hold inflexibly to your purpose, for it will not be long now until the Lord comes. …The Judge is here – standing at the door. James 5: 7- 9, part of 10″
    Would you agree that the “standing at the door” picture signifies that he has just about arrived and is about to enter ?
    In light of this, would you say he’s been taking about 30-40 years (time between ascension and writing of James) to come to the front of the door and then it has taken him already about 2000 years since of standing in front of the door to open and enter? Was James mistaken and the judge wasn’t really standing at the door yet when he wrote what he wrote?

    God bless you
    Wolfgang

  3. on 20 Jan 2007 at 1:53 pmJohnO

    Wolfgang,

    If you’d like to present a clear definition of your points, Sean has extended you the offer to make a post here. We’ve handled your points in the other thread, and you stopped commenting there, signifying (at least to me) that you’re content. If you’re not content, please present a unified view of scripture that supports your points - as we’ve offered you a chance to do.

  4. on 21 Jan 2007 at 12:35 pmKen

    John,
    Good point about the significance of the vision of the Transfiguration, which in the 3 gospel records in which it is recorded, immediately follows a declaration that some standing there would not taste death until they saw the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
    The authorship of Revelation is an interesting point that I would like to look into. Thanks.

    Wolfgang,
    God bless you.

  5. on 22 Jan 2007 at 6:45 amWolfgang

    Dear Ken,
    as for the authorship and writing of the Book of Revelation, you may want to have a look at Google and seach for “dating of the Book of Revelation” and get quite a number of pages with information.
    One interesting article is found at http://ecclesia.org/truth/revelation.html with a discussion of the various theories.

    God bless you
    Wolfgang

  6. on 22 Jan 2007 at 12:52 pmSean

    In regards to the authorship of Revelation, the traditional vocabulary, form, etc. arguments (that John the Apostle did not write it) are not convincing to me. I have heard that the earliest Christian writings confirm that John the Apostle (the beloved, the aged) wrote Revelation. Furthermore, this book is prophetic like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, etc. thus one would not expect the style/vocabulary to be the same. Especially considering that Revelation is really an introduction followed by seven short letters (dictated by the exalted Messiah not originating from John’s mind) followed by an extended vision (the longest in the Bible). John is reporting what he is seeing as he is sees it. This is totally unprecedented in his other writings (the gospel of John = narrative; 1 - 3 John = epistles). Therefore one should not expect it to sound the same.

Leave a Reply